Comparison

Every way to analyse your Playtomic data, compared

There is no single right answer for every club. A one-court community club and a ten-venue group have very different needs and budgets. This page lays out the realistic options, roughly in order of effort.

We make CourtPulse, so we are not neutral — but we've tried to describe each option by the work it involves rather than by claims about other products.

At a glance

OptionEffort & best forLimits
Playtomic Manager's built-in reportsEffort: none. Best for day-to-day operations.Limits: whatever your plan includes; history depends on what Playtomic exposes.
Exports + spreadsheetsEffort: an hour or more per report. Best for one-off analysis.Limits: manual, error-prone, no alerts.
BI tool (Looker Studio, Power BI)Effort: a data project up front plus maintenance.Limits: you own the pipeline and the metric definitions.
Custom code against the Playtomic APIEffort: engineering time and hosting.Limits: only worth it for very specific needs.
CourtPulseEffort: about five minutes to connect. $19/month or $190/year.Limits: focused on venue analytics — use CSV export for anything else.

Simpler options are enough when…

  • Built-in reports: a single club with simple, operational questions.
  • Spreadsheets: occasional deep-dives by someone who enjoys modelling.
  • BI / custom code: groups with in-house data skills and cross-business reporting needs.

CourtPulse fits when…

  • Clubs that want occupancy, revenue-per-court, retention and payout answers without building anything.
  • Owners who need regular reports for partners or investors.
  • Operators running several venues across cities or time zones.

Verdict

Start with what you have. When the questions you ask every month need an export to answer, try CourtPulse free for 14 days and compare the time it saves with the $19 it costs.

Frequently asked questions

See it with your own Playtomic data

Connect read-only API credentials in under five minutes, or explore the live demo first.

Features mentioned on this page

More comparisons